A plan to turn 245 pictures we already have into free traffic — plus how we’ll finally know where customers come from.
Read this on the way to work. It is written in plain words. At the bottom there are six decisions only you can make — answer those and I can build the whole thing.
You uploaded 8 pins in August and then nothing. Here is what those 8 pins have done in six weeks:
| Pin | Views | Saves | Clicks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Big Sister | 103 | 0 | 2 |
| Superhero | 66 | 0 | 0 |
| Dragon | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Starting School | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Bedtime Story | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Pirate | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Princess | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Christmas | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 199 | 0 | 3 |
In plain words
That is not a failed Pinterest test. That is no Pinterest test at all. Eight pictures, posted once, six weeks ago, then silence. Pinterest is like a shop shelf: if you put eight things on it and never come back, nobody finds the shop.
Two other things are wrong with those eight. They are all old artwork — the 3D princess and pirate, the photo-real big sister — and none of it is watercolour, which is the only style we sell now.
The one number to keep an eye on
Zero saves. On Pinterest, a “save” is how the site decides whether to show something to more people. Across 199 views I’d have expected a handful. We got none. That is weak evidence, not proof — 199 views is a tiny sample and most of it is one pin — but it is the number that will tell us the truth once we post properly.
This is the part that makes Pinterest worth doing. We do not need to make anything new.
| What | How many | Where it lives |
|---|---|---|
| Painted pages + covers from the 16 books actually on sale | 203 | already public on littletailorbooks.co.uk |
| Video reels (the 15-second photo→painted ones) | 12 | already public at /reels/ |
| FAQ cards (the Saturday question posts) | 30 | already public at /faq/ |
| Total pins available today | 245 | — |
All of it sits on littletailorbooks.co.uk, which is the domain already claimed in your Pinterest settings. That matters: claimed means every pin is credited to your account and you get the stats.
And the machinery is already built
tools/build_pinterest_csv.py). It made the August batch. It needs updating to watercolour-only and the new books, not rewriting.In plain words
We have 245 pictures ready to go, a proven way to post hundreds at once, and the tool half-written. This is the cheapest thing on your whole list. The only cost is my time and about ten minutes of yours per batch.
I write a spreadsheet, you drag it into Pinterest once, and pins publish on their own for the next few weeks. That drag-and-drop is the only part a human has to do, and it takes about ten minutes, once or twice a month.
The real risk, stated honestly
Dumping 200 pins in one go can get the account killed. Pinterest’s own rules name this exact behaviour — “adding a lot of Pins from the same website quickly” — and there are 2026 reports of clean accounts being suspended automatically, including one with no pins at all. These bans are done by machine and there is effectively no appeal.
So: 10–15 pins a day, never more, for the first month. Every pin gets its own picture, its own title and its own words. We use the spreadsheet to spread pins out, not to dump them.
There are three things nobody has ever actually checked, and each one could waste a whole batch. Each test is a spreadsheet with two or three rows and costs nothing.
| Test | The question | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| A. Same link twice | If two pins point at the same page, do both publish? | One report says a 100-pin upload published one pin. We have 245 pins but only 16 book pages. If this is real, it changes everything about how we build the file. |
| B. Dates far ahead | Can we schedule a pin 60 days out, not just 30? | Decides whether all the Christmas pins can be loaded now, in one go, or have to be drip-fed in November when you are busiest. |
| C. One video | Does a reel upload and play properly as a pin? | Before we commit 12 reels to the plan. |
All three run in one upload. You drag one small file in, we wait a day, we look. That is the whole test.
Boards are what Pinterest actually searches. So they get keyword names, not clever ones. A board called “Our Stories” is a shelf with no sign on it.
| Board | Why |
|---|---|
| Personalised Books for Kids | the main phrase — our own shelf |
| Personalised Christmas Gifts for Children | the season, and the only deadline that matters |
| Starting School Gifts | the group that produced our earliest leads |
| Big Sister & Big Brother Gifts | around 750 UK searches a month, nobody has claimed it |
| Birthday Gifts for Kids | broad, works all year |
| Princess, Pirate & Dragon Stories | the themed books in one place |
| When | What | Pins |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | The three tiny tests, then the first real batch — Christmas books first, because the season is now | ~70 |
| Week 2–3 | The rest of the on-sale books, best pages first | ~90 |
| Week 4 | The 12 reels as video pins + the strongest FAQ cards | ~40 |
| November | Top-up batch, Christmas-led, plus anything that got saves | ~45 |
In plain words
About 245 pins over four to five weeks, at a pace Pinterest is comfortable with. After the first upload you do roughly ten minutes of dragging a file, once a fortnight. Everything else is automatic.
Honest about timing
Pinterest is slow. Pins build up over months — that is the good bit (they keep working long after you post them) and the bad bit (they are not a switch you flip in October). Do not expect this to rescue this Christmas. Expect a trickle this year and a real channel by next autumn. If you want something that could move this Christmas, that is paid retargeting on Facebook, and that is a separate conversation.
Your worry, and it is a good one: “if we advertise free, more people will click but fewer will buy, and our numbers will look worse.”
You are right that it happens. You are wrong that it matters. Here is why.
Imagine two adverts.
| Advert A “Book, £36.98” | Advert B “Free preview” | |
|---|---|---|
| People who ask for a preview | 10 | 40 |
| How many of them buy | 50% | 25% |
| Books sold | 5 | 10 |
| Profit at £18 each | £90 | £180 |
| Paint wasted on the ones who didn’t buy (£1 each) | −£5 | −£30 |
| You keep | £85 | £150 |
Advert B has a much worse-looking percentage and makes you nearly twice the money. The percentage is vanity. Money per pound spent is the only score.
But your instinct is still half right
A bad lead is not free to you. Every preview you paint costs about £1, plus your time checking it. So we should not chase “free” clicks from people who would never spend £37 on a book.
Lead with the free preview — but put the price in the words. Something like:
“See your child painted into the whole book, free, before you pay a penny. £6.99 as an ebook, or £36.98 for the British hardcover, delivered.”
That keeps the hook that gets the click, and quietly turns away the person who was never going to pay. Best of both. It is also simply true, which is how we do everything else.
And crucially: we track the two kinds of visitor separately (next section), so a free-preview campaign can never quietly poison the numbers of the rest of the business. That was the real danger in your question, and it is fixable with tracking rather than by choosing the weaker advert.
The problem today
I checked the code. An order records its source as either etsy or web. That is all. Of your 26 customers you cannot tell me how a single one found you. Spending money on adverts without this is spending blind — you already get around 15 orders a month arriving on their own, so 8 extra from an advert would vanish into the pile and you would never know.
You said you were torn about asking the customer, and that asking at the free-sample stage might scare people off. I agree. Here is the design, and it does not add a single step to ordering.
?utm_source=pinterest&utm_campaign=xmas.Why we need the human question as well
Your best channel ever was your estate WhatsApp group — the first sale, the review and the second order all came from one free local post. No automatic tracking can ever see that. A friend telling a friend arrives looking like a stranger typing your name into Google. The one question catches what the code cannot.
A free bonus — it fixes the Pinterest problem too
Remember Test A: pins that share a destination might not all publish. Once every link carries its own tag, every pin’s link is genuinely different — and it is different for a real, honest reason that every marketer in the world uses, not a trick to dodge Pinterest’s spam filter. One piece of work, two problems solved.
My estimate: half a day. And it is the thing that makes every future decision measurable instead of guessed.
The honest truth from your own books, checked today:
| Now | |
|---|---|
| Preview requests, all time | 27 |
| Paid | 8 |
| Conversion | 29.6% |
| Profit per paid book | ~£18 |
| Paint wasted per preview that doesn’t sell | £1 |
| So one preview request is worth | £4.86 |
Pinterest is free, so anything above zero is profit. But “free” still costs my time, so here is the scoreboard:
| By end of November, after ~245 pins | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Saves happening, 200+ clicks, 2+ preview requests go | It works. Keep feeding it, and consider paying to promote the pins that already did well on their own. |
| Clicks but no preview requests fix | Pinterest likes us, the landing page doesn’t convert. Fix the page, not the pins. |
| Still almost no saves stop | Pinterest is not the room for this product. We will have learned it for £0 and we stop, instead of wondering for another year. |
The number I will report on is saves, then clicks, then preview requests. Not views. Views are the number Pinterest shows you to keep you happy.
1. Do we go ahead with Pinterest at all?
My recommendation: yes. It is free, the pictures already exist, the tool is half-built, and the downside is a few hours of my time. But it will not rescue this Christmas — go in expecting next year.
2. Tracking first, or pins first?
My recommendation: tracking first. Half a day, and without it we cannot tell whether any of this worked — and it also unblocks the duplicate-link problem. Pins the same week, straight after.
3. The one extra question on the thank-you screen — yes or no?
My recommendation: yes, after the order is placed, skippable. It is the only way to see word-of-mouth. If you would rather have nothing at all in the customer’s way, say so and we run on the invisible tracking alone — we’d just be blind to friends telling friends.
4. Free preview as the hook, with the price stated?
My recommendation: yes. Free is what earns the click; the price in the words keeps the time-wasters out. And tracked separately so it can never poison the rest of the numbers.
5. The AI question. needs your call
Pinterest has a “this was made with AI” switch when you post a pin by hand. The bulk spreadsheet has no such column — so posting this way cannot make that disclosure at all, even if we wanted to.
Every one of our books is AI-painted. This is a decision to take with open eyes rather than by accident. Options: post by bulk and say nothing (what everyone in this market does); or say it plainly in the pin description, which is honest and costs us nothing but may put some people off. I lean towards mentioning “painted by hand from your photo” only where it is literally true, and not claiming a human held a brush. Your call, and I will follow it.
6. Do you want the Facebook retargeting conversation too?
Pinterest is the long game. If you want something that could move this Christmas, the candidate is paid retargeting to people who already visited the site — far cheaper than strangers. It needs the tracking from decision 2 first anyway. Say the word and I’ll price it properly.